Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halo (Texas song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Pmlineditor ∞ 10:56, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Halo (Texas song)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

little content, not likely the song will become more notable after 12 years. can be merged to main article. Alan - talk 21:45, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Clearly a notable song. Texas were big enough at the time that the single would have been reviewed in many print sources, so sources will exist even though a Google search may not find them.--Michig (talk) 21:51, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - It's a notable song (making No10 in the United Kingdom), and - as Michig's said - there are surely going to be sources for it. The only thing that's keeping them from being found is it being released in "the pre-Internet days" (i.e. 1997). DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 22:50, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Clearly a notable song. It charted and was a big hit single! I spent time expanding this article too. Wikipedia should be expansive and this article should certainly remain.--Davidkt 20:27, 23 November 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidkt (talk • contribs)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 01:31, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.